Bulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public HealthBulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health2415-84102415-8429FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»2215Научная статьяFROM FOREIGN EXPERIENCE OF MEDICAL ORGANIZATIONS RATINGNechaevV. Svn52@inbox.ruProkinovaA. N-National Research Institute for Public Health151220165717514042022Copyright © 2016,2016The article considers foreign experience of rating of medical organizations in the USA, Canada, Australia, Great Britain and other countries. It is demonstrated that rating is accessible and coherent form of medical care quality control. The results of rating form reputation of particular medical organization.ratingmedical organizationreputation of organizationрейтингованиемедицинская организациярепутация организации1.Авдеева М.В., Ващенков В.В., Лучкевич В.С., Баркаева В.А. Рейтингование медицинских организаций как способ повышения эффективности здравоохранения: история вопроса и перспективы использования // Социальные аспекты здоровья населения (электронный научный журнал) http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/692/27/lang,ru/2.Тарасенко Е.А. Зарубежный опыт выбора показателей качества медицинской помощи для построения рейтингов медицинских организаций: уроки для России. Социальные аспекты здоровья населения [электронный научный журнал] 2013; 34 (6). URL: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/520/lang?ru/3.O'Donnell J.C., Pham S.V., Pashos C.L, Miller D.W., Smith H. Technology Assessment: Lessons Learned from Around the World - An Overview. Value Health 2009; 12 (Suppl. 2): 1-5.4.Woohyun C., Sunhee L., Hye Y.K., Myongkeun K. Setting national priorities for quality assessment of health care services in Korea [Online]. 2005 [cited 2015 May 12]; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc /mzi018157-165.5.Canadian agency for drugs and technologies in health. Canadian coordinating office for health technology assessment to Canadian agency for drugs and technologies in health our history [Online]. 2006 [cited 2015 May 15]; Available from: http://www.cadth.ca/index.php/en/cadth/ corporate-profile/history.6.Consumer reports: how we rate hospitals [Online]. 2014 [cited 2015 May 12]; Available from: http://www.consumerreports.org/health/resources/pdf/how-we- rate-hospitals/How%20We%20Rate%20 Hospitals.pdf7.Hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems [Online]. 2015 [cited 2015 May 20]; Available from: http://www.hcahpsonline.org/qaguidelines.aspx8.Sabik L.M., Lie R.K. Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries. International Journal for Equity in Health 2008; (7): 1-13.9.Austin J.M., Jha A.K., Romano P.S. Singer S.J., Vogus T.J., Wachter R.M., Pronovost P.J. National hospital ratings systems share few common scores and may generate confusion instead of clarity. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015; 34 (3): 423-430.10.Donabedian А. The criteria and standards of quality. Michigan: Health Administration Press, 1982. 504 p.