Bulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public HealthBulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health2415-84102415-8429FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»268610.69541/NRIPH.2025.01.010Научная статьяAnalysis of developed innovative technologies within the framework of clinical testing in medical care
profilesGabrielyanArthur R.gkb-eramishanzeva@zdrav.mos.ruAlexandrovaOksana Yuaou18@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0761-1838MikhailovIlya A.mikhailov@rosmedex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8020-369XCity Clinical Hospital named after A. K. Yeramishantsev of the Moscow Healthcare DepartmentN. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public HealthN.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public HealthCenter of Expertise and Quality Control of Healthcare of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationRussian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education020420251646921042025Copyright © 2025,2025<p>The objective of the study was to analyze of developed innovative technologies within the framework of clinical testing in<br />medical care profiles. To conduct this analysis the clinical testing protocols for 2023 and 2024 from the website of the Ministry of Health<br />of the Russian Federation were used (https://minzdrav.gov.ru/poleznye-resursy/protokoly-klinicheskoy-aprobatsii/klinicheskoy-aprobatsii). Based on the analysis of the application of the developed innovative technologies within the framework of clinical testing by medical<br />care profiles for 2023, it was found that the largest number of methods (protocols) were for cardiovascular surgery (38.61%). Based on the<br />analysis of the distribution of developed innovative technologies within the framework of clinical testing by types (stages of the treatment and diagnostic process) for 2023, it was found that the largest number of methods (protocols) were for treatment methods <br />84.16%, which corresponds to 85 methods out of 101 clinical testing methods included in the analysis for 2023. Based on the analysis of<br />the use of developed innovative technologies within the framework of clinical testing by medical care profiles for 2024, it was found that<br />the largest number of methods (protocols) were in obstetrics and gynecology 42.03%, which corresponds to 29 implemented clinical<br />testing protocols. In 2024, medical care using innovative medical technologies within the framework of clinical testing was mainly provided within the framework of treatment methods in the profiles of obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics and neonatology in those federal<br />medical organizations that provide medical care within the framework of clinical testing. Compared to 2023, in 2024 there is a clear emphasis on innovative methods of providing medical care aimed at protecting motherhood and childhood, which is one of the main priorities of the healthcare system of the Russian Federation for the period from 2025 to 2030.</p>innovative technologieshealthcare managementmedical organizationimplementation of innovative medical technologiesclinical testingинновационные технологииуправление здравоохранениеммедицинская организациявнедрение инновационных медицинских технологийклиническая апробация[Lehman W. E.K., Simpson D. D., Knight D. K., Flynn P. M. Integration of treatment innovation planning and implementation: strategic process models and organizational challenges. Psychology][of Addictive Behaviors. 2011;25(2):252—261. DOI: 10.1037/a0022682][May C. Agency and implementation: understanding the embedding of healthcare innovations in practice. Soc. Sci. Med.][2013;78:26—33. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.021][Wandersman A., Duffy J., Flaspohler P., Noonan R., Lubell K., Stillman L., et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am. J. Community Psychol. 2008;41(3—4):171—181. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z][Schell S. F., Luke D. A., Schooley M. W., Elliott M. B., Herbers S. H.,][Mueller N. B., et al. Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework. Implement. Sci. 2013;(8):15. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-15][Scheirer M. A., Dearing J. W. An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. Am. J. Public Health.][2011;101(11):2059—2067. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300193][Aarons G. A., Hurlburt M., Horwitz S. M. Advancing a conceptual][model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm. Policy Ment. Health. 2011;38(1):4—23. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7][Meyers D. C., Durlak J. A., Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am. J. Community Psychol. 2012;50(3—4):462—480. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x][Palmer D., Kramlich D. An introduction to the multisystem model][of knowledge integration and translation. ANS. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 2011;34(1):29—38. DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0b013e318209439f]