Bulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public HealthBulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health2415-84102415-8429FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»283810.69541/NRIPH.2024.03.011Научная статьяThe effectiveness of radiation diagnostics management using analytical dashboards: the oncological aspectVasilevYuriy A.VasilevYA1@zdrav.mos.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5283-5961IvanovaGalina V.IvanovaGV13@zdrav.mos.ruhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-8470-223XMukhortovaAnna N.MukhortovaAN@zdrav.mos.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9814-3533FilinMichael E.FilinME1@zdrav.mos.ruhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-9851-1058ShulkinIgor M.ShulkinIM@zdrav.mos.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7613-5273VladzymyrskyyAnton V.VladzimirskijAV@zdrav.mos.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-7736State Budget-Funded Health Care Institution of the City of Moscow «Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department»011020243728027052025Copyright © 2025,2025<p>Early diagnosis plays an important role in the successful treatment of oncological diseases. The well-coordinated interaction of the radiological technician and the radiologist and the formation of the research protocol timely represent the key stages of effective medical care provision for patients. Today, a new trend prevails in healthcare management. It is management based on objective data, the implementation of which is possible by using a universal tool dashboard.<br />Purpose. The purpose of our research was to study the effectiveness of using the analytical panel as a tool for monitoring the timeliness of the preparation of research protocols in radiation diagnostics.<br />Material and methods. The work of the radiology departments was constantly monitored with help of the developed analytical panel Oncology CT, MRI, MMG. Among other analyzed parameters, the proportion of the results of radiation examinations sent for expert review and the proportion of the results of preventive mammography classified as BI-RADS 3 were evaluated. When deviations were detected, intervention was carried out (two types of management actions). The results of the interventions were evaluated after 1 year.<br />Results. In comparison with the data of 2022, in 2023 there was a decrease in the percentage of studies not sent to the second reading: for CT of the kidneys and urinary tract from 27.5% to 0%, for MRI of the prostate from 32.13% to 0.17%, for MMG from 100% to 3%. According to the monitoring results, the intervention contributed to a decrease in the percentage of BI-RADS 3 in MMG protocols from 6.1% in 2022 to 4.16% in 2023.<br />Limitations of the study. The monitoring was carried out using the developed analytical panel Oncology CT, MRI, MMG<br />Conclusion. The implementation of the dashboard Oncology CT, MRI, MMG into clinical practice allowed to optimize the diagnostic process, eliminating delays in obtaining conclusions, as well as improving their quality, thanks to the double reading of images and continuous training of specialists.</p>dashboardanalytical panelradiation diagnosticsdata visualizationhealthcareдашборданалитическая панельлучевая диагностикавизуализация данныхздравоохранение[Kaprin A.D., Starinskogo V.V., Shahzadovoj A.O. The state of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2022. Moscow; 2023. P.239 (in Russian).][Shelyakin V.A., Linnik S.A., Tretyakov D.A. et al. Planning medical care for patients with cancer in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Manager Zdravoochranenia. [Menedzher zdravoohraneniya]. 2023;(1):60—69 (in Russian). DOI:10.21045/1811-0185-2023-1-60-69][Gelezhe P.B., Blohin I.A., Semenov D.S. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in prostate cancer radiology: what is currently known? Digit. Diagnostics. Digital Diagnostics]. 2022;2(4):441—452 (in Russian). DOI:10.17816/DD70170][Perkhov V.I., Korkhmazov V.T. About priorities of federal projects in the field of health care. Current problems of health care and medical statistics. [Sovremennye problemy zdravoohraneniya i medicinskoj statistiki]. 2023;(2):870—893 (in Russian). DOI:10.24412/2312-2935-2023-2-870-893][Pashigorova L.V., Ponomarenko B.T. Social aspects of the implementation of the federal project “Fight against cancer”. Ethnosocium and interethnic culture. [Etnosocium i mezhnacional'naya kul'tura]. 2020;142(4):34—42 (in Russian).][Jawa R.S. et al. A reference guide to rapidly implementing an institutional dashboard for resource allocation and oversight during COVID-19 pandemic surge. JAMIA Open. 2021;3(4):518—522. DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa054][Greco K.J. et al. A Dashboard for Tracking Mortality After Cardiac Surgery Using a National Administrative Database. Cardiol. Res.2021;12(2):86—90. DOI:10.14740/cr1220][Makic M.B.F. et al. Dashboard Design to Identify and Balance Competing Risk of Multiple Hospital-Acquired Conditions. Appl. Clin. Inform. 2022;13(03):621—631. DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1749598][Taxter A. et al. Co-design of an Electronic Dashboard to Support the Coproduction of Care in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Human-Centered Design and Usability Testing. J. Particip. Med.2022;14(1):e34735. DOI:10.2196/34735][Rivas C. et al. Automated analysis of free-text comments and dashboard representations in patient experience surveys: a multimethod co-design study. Heal. Serv. Deliv. Res. 2019;7(23):1—160. DOI:10.3310/hsdr07230][Murphy D.R. et al. Dashboards for visual display of patient safety data: a systematic review. BMJ Heal. Care Informatics.2021;28(1):e100437. DOI:10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100437][Scheinfeld M.H. et al. The Emergency Radiology Dashboard: Facilitating Workflow With Realtime Data. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol. 2020;49(4):231—233. DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.02.013][Fareed N. et al. U.S. COVID-19 State Government Public Dashboards: An Expert Review. Appl. Clin. Inform. 2021;12(02):208—221. DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1723989][Pestana M., Pereira R., Moro S. Improving Health Care Management in Hospitals Through a Productivity Dashboard. J. Med. Syst.2020;44(4):87. DOI:10.1007/s10916-020-01546-1][Fazaeli S. et al. Development, Implementation, and User Evaluation of COVID-19 Dashboard in a Third-Level Hospital in Iran. Appl. Clin. Inform. 2021;12(05):1091—1100. DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1740188][Jan Z. et al. Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction and Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Scoping Review. J. Med. Internet Res.2023;25:e44248. DOI:10.2196/44248][Sung H. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA. CancerJ. Clin. 2021;71(3):209—249. DOI:10.2196/44248][Ogrinc G. et al. SQUIRE-EDU (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence in Education): Publication Guidelines for Educational Improvement. Acad. Med. 2019;94(10):1461—1470. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002750][Golbits A.B. et al. Bosniak classification version 2019: updated algorithms for the diagnosis of cystic renal masses. Cancer Urol.2022;17(4):165—175. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-4-165-175][Abuladze L.R., Semenov D.S., Panina O.Yu. et al. Optimized biparametric magnetic resonance imaging protocol for prostate cancer detection. Digit. Diagnostics. 2022;3(3):166—177 (in Russian). DOI:10.17816/DD108484][Nikolaev A.E., Blohin I.A., SHapiev A.N. et al. Application of the PI-RADS system in the MR diagnosis of the prostate gland (adapted version of the classification system for evaluation of data and drawing up a conclusion in the interpretation of MRI of prostate PI-RADS of the American Radiological Society). Best practices of radiation and instrumental diagnostics. [Luchshie praktiki luchevoj i instrumental'noj diagnostiki]. 2019;(31):26 (in Russian).][Kharuzhyk S.A., ShymanetsS.V., KarmanA.V. et al. Use of BIRADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. [Vestnik rentgenologii i radiologii]. 2014;(4):46—59 (in Russian).][Vazquez-Ingelmo A., Garcia-Penalvo F.J., Theron R. Information Dashboards and Tailoring Capabilities — A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access. 2019;7:109673—109688.][Verhovskaya Е., Mikheev A., Romanov A. Rapid prototyping of graphical representations of data (dashboards) for the head workstation in the HIS. Vrach i Inf. Tehnol. 2019;(4):58—64.][Baugh C.W. et al. Strategies to mitigate emergency department crowding and its impact on cardiovascular patients. Eur. Hear. J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care. 2023;12(9):633—643. DOI:10.1093/ehjacc/zuad049][Dreiher J. et al. Emergency Department Admission Rates, Waiting Times, and Mortality: An Observational Study in the Tertiary Center Most Proximal to Gaza During a Military Conflict. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2023;(17):e463. DOI:10.1017/dmp.2023. 45][Reis A. et al. Monitoring System for Emergency Service in a Hospital Environmen. 2019 IEEE 6th Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering (ENBENG). IEEE. 2019;1—4. DOI:10.1109/ENBENG.2019. 8692461]