Bulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public HealthBulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health2415-84102415-8429FSSBI «N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health»292210.69541/NRIPH.2025.02.003Научная статьяSurgical smoke as a risk factor for the morbidity of scrub nurses in a professional environmentNataliaA. Kasimovskayakasimovskaya_n_a@staff.sechenov.ruOlgaI. Moruginamorugina_o_i@staff.sechenov.ruA.Diana Shorina Ashorina_d_a@staff.sechenov.ruFederal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russian Federation200720252202401082025Copyright © 2025,2025The state of health of scrub nurses is influenced by professional activity. The article presents an analysis of the effects of surgical smoke on the health of operating nurses, the frequency of development of chronic oropharyngeal pathology and symptoms during work in the operating unit, the load on the scrub nurse per shift is presented. The study proved the direct and strong influence of surgical smoke on the occupational morbidity of scrub nurses, at the same time, directions for a preventive solution to the problem of exposure to surgical smoke were identified and presented.morbidity, health status, scrub nurses, surgical smoke, coagulation smoke, risk factors, professional environment, quality of medical care.заболеваемость, состояние здоровья, операционные медицинские сестры, хирургический дым, коагуляционный дым, факторы риска, профессиональная среда, качество медицинской помощи.1.Martí-Ejarque MDM, GuiuLázaro G., Juncal R.C, Pérez Paredes S, Díez-García C. Occupational Diseases and Perceived Health in Operating Room Nurses: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Observational Study. Inquiry. 2021;(58):1—8. DOI: 10.1177/004695802110607742.Бронштейн, Г. П., Аджиева А. А. Опасность хирургического дыма и способы ее устранения. Г. П. Бронштейн, А. А. Аджиева. Эндоскопическая хирургия. 2023;(4):32—36. DOI: 10.17116/endoskop202329041323.Mowbray N. G., Ansell J., Horwood J., Cornish J., Rizkallah P., Parker A. et al. Safe management of surgical smoke in the age of COVID-19. British Journal of Surgery.2020;(11):1406—1413. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.116794.Benaim Ezer H., Jaspers Ilona. Surgical smoke and its components, effects, and mitigation: a contemporary review. Toxicological Sciences. 2024;198(2):157—168.5.Asghar M. S. et al. Surgical smoke; an occupational hazard. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 2020;70(10):1807—1807. DOI: 10.5455/JPMA.386146.Li C. I., Chou Y. H., Pai J. Y., Chen C. H., Chiang M. C. Investigating surgical smoke in otolaryngology operating rooms. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1719. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05701-17.Bree K., Barnhill S., Rundell W. The Dangers of Electrosurgical Smoke to Operating Room Personnel: A Review. Workplace Health & Safety. 2017;65(11):517—526. DOI: 10.1177/21650799176910638.Meretsky C. R., Mahmoodi A., Knecht E. M., Popovich J., Schiuma A. T. The Impact of Electrocautery Smoke on Surgical Staff and the Efficacy of Normal Surgical Masks Versus N 95 Masks. Cureus. 2024;16(4):1—11. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58106