Efficacy of various tb screening methods in vulnerable groups (analytical review)
- Authors: Zagdyn Z.M.1, Kobesov N.V.2, Dmitrieva M.P.3, Pechenkin A.V.1
- Affiliations:
- N. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
- Republic Clinical Center of Pthisiopulmonology of Ministry of Health Care of Republic of North Ossetia-Alania
- Saint-Petersburg State Budgetary Health Care Facility “City antituberculous dispensary”
- Issue: No 3 (2024)
- Section: Общественное здоровье и организация здравоохранения
- URL: http://bulleten-nriph.ru/journal/article/view/2770
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.25742/NRIPH.2023.03.005
- Cite item
Abstract
One of the fundamental principles of public health is the collaboration of prevention and treatment of diseases, especially socially significant ones, including infections, such as TB. Preventive measures to reduce the TB spread include its early detection (screening), among key risk groups too. The study aim, provided by using information-analytical and statistical methods, based on own materials, national and foreign publications, data obtained from federal statistical observation forms, is to know the effectiveness of various TB and LTBI screening methods, among vulnerable groups. The study results show that in Russia, along with improvement in the epidemic situation, periodic CXR examinations continue to be the main TB screening method. Effective and modern TB screening methods are used extremely rarely: MGM (6,2%), IGRA-tests for LTBI screening among key risk groups are used non-systemically, mainly among children, along with national ART. Meanwhile, with equal rates of population screening coverage and share of new TB cases found by screening, its detection rate in regions with a high TB incidence is significantly prevailing in regions with a low once (95,0% CI: -0,12 — -3,11, p<0,02). The obtained data indicate the need for a differentiated approach to provide TB screening measures: in regions with a high TB incidence, to maintain mass CXR screening; in areas with low incidence rates, active TB screening should be carried out only among vulnerable groups, including usage of MGM, ATR and IGRA-tests for LTBI screening, and passive TB screening should be organized among those who seek medical care.
About the authors
Zinaida M. Zagdyn
N. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
Author for correspondence.
Email: dinmetyan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1149-5400
Russian Federation, 105064, Moscow, Russian Federation
Nikolay V. Kobesov
Republic Clinical Center of Pthisiopulmonology of Ministry of Health Care of Republic of North Ossetia-Alania
Email: kobesovn@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9833-5700
Russian Federation, 362015, Lechebniy proezd, 1, Vladikavkaz, Russia
Mariya P. Dmitrieva
Saint-Petersburg State Budgetary Health Care Facility “City antituberculous dispensary”
Email: masha.dmitrieva@gmail.com
Russian Federation, 196142, Zvezdnaya street, 12, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Anatoliy V. Pechenkin
N. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
Email: a.pechenkin@pharmline.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-9821-3566
Russian Federation, 105064, Moscow, Russian Federation
References
- Bayanova N.A., Puzhalin Ya.D., Mamedov V.G. Pro and contra to the N.A.Semashko health care system. Yang Scientist. [Molodoj ucheniy]. 2016;130(26):196—99 (in Russian).
- Khabriev R.U., Lindenbraten A.L., Komarov Yu.M. The strategy of health care of population as a background of public social policy. Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine. [Problemy socialnoj gigieny, zdravooxraneniya i istorii mediciny]. 2014;22(3):3—5 (In Russian).
- Schepin V.O., Zudin A.B. Mechanisms for organizing and providing primary prevention measures of oncological diseases. Bulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health. [Byulleten Nacionalnogo nauchnoissledovatelskogo instituta obshhestvennogo zdorovya imeni N.A.Semashko]. 2012;(3):47. (In Russian).
- Vasileva I.A., Borisov S.E., Son I.M., Popov S.A., Nechaeva O.B., Belilovskiy E.M., Danilova I.D. Multidrug resistance tuberculosis. Tuberculosis in the Russian Federation 2012/2013/2014. Analytical review of statistical indicators used in the Russian Federation and in the world. M.; 2015. P.196—223 (In Russian).
- Vasileva I.A., Belilovskiy E.M., Borisov S.E., Sterlikov S.A. Tuberculosis with concurrent HIV infection in the Russian Federation and the world. Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases. [Tuberkulez i bolezni legkix]. 2017;95(9):8—18 (In Russian).
- Nechaeva O.B. Monitoring of tuberculosis and HIV-infection in the Russian Federation. Medical Alphabet. [Medicinskiy alfavit].2017;3(30):24—33 (In Russian).
- Vasileva I.A., Sterlikov S.A., Testov V.V., Mikhailova Yu.V., Golubev N.A., Kucheryavaya D.A., Gordina A.V., Ponomarev S.B. Resources and activities of anti-tuberculosis facilities of the Russian Federation in 2020—2021. M.: RIO Central Research Institute of organization and informatization of healthcare; 2022 (In Russian).
- Gupta R.K., Lipman M., Story A., Hayward A., G. de Vries, R. van Hest, et al. Active case finding and treatment adherence in risk groups in the tuberculosis pre-elimination era. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018;22(5):479—87. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0767.
- Bogorodskaya E.M., Belilovskiy E.M., Borisov S.E. Ry`bka L.N., Petrov V.A., Matveeva M.V. Tuberculosis incidence in the migrants and homeless in Moscow. Tuberculosis and Socially Significant Diseases. [Tuberkulez i social`no znachimy`e zabolevaniya]. 2014;(4):3—17 (In Russian).
- Kornilova Z.X., Khulkhachiev O.B. Modern approaches to TB detection among migrants. Social aspects of population health. [Social`ny`e aspekty` zdorov`ya naseleniya]. 2015 (In Russian).
- Mallikarjun V. Jali, Vinay K. Mahishale, Murigendra B. Hiremath. Bidirectional Screening of Tuberculosis Patients for Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetes. Patients for Tuberculosis Diabetes & Metabolism Journal. 2013;37(4):291—95. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2013.37.4.291.
- Byrne A.L., Ben J Marais B.J., Mitnick C.D., LeccaL., G.B.Tuberculosis and chronic respiratory disease: a systematic review. Int J Inf Dis. 2015:138—46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.12.016.
- Narh-Bana S.A., Kawonga M., Odopey S.A., Bonsu F., Ibisomi L., Chirwa T.F. Factors influencing the implementation of TB screening among PLHIV in selected HIV clinics in Ghana: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):898. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08295-6.
- Dantsev V.V., Karpuschenko V.G., Bolekxan V.N., Muchaidze R.D., Ivanov V.V., Shitov Yu.N., Spitsyn M.G. The directions of preventive work in the military servicemen with increased risk of tuberculosis. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. [Vestnik Rossijskoj Voenno-medicinskoj akademii]. 2016;3(55):99—104 (In Russian).
- Humphreys A., Abbara A., Williams S., John L., Corrah T., McGregor A., Davidson R.N. Screening contacts of patients with extrapulmonary TB forlatent TB infection. Thorax. 2018;73(3):277—78.
- Golubev D.N., Egorova O.S., Medvinskiy I.D, Golubev Yu.D. The incidence of TB health workers in TB facilities of Sverdlovsk region. Ural Medical Journal. [Ural`skiy medicinskiy zhurnal]. 2014;120(6):102—07 (In Russian).
- WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 2: Screening. Systematic screening for tuberculosis diseases. Geneva: WHO; 2022.
- Alsdurf H., Emringham B., Miller C., Zwerling A. Tuberculosis screening costs and cost-effectivenes in high-risk groups: a systematic review. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2021;(21):935. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06633-3.
- Zwerling A.A., Sahu M., Ngwira L.G., Khundi McE., Harawa T., Corbett E.L., et al. Screening for tuberculosis among adults newly diagnosed with HIV in sub-saharan Africa: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;70(1):83—90. doi: 10.1097/QAI.00000 00000 000712.
- Reddy K.P., Gupta-Wright A., Fielding K.L., Costantini S., Zheng A., Corbett E.L., et al. Cost-effectiveness of urine-based tuberculosis screening in hospitalised patients with HIV in Africa: a microsimulation modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(2):e200–8. doi: 10.1016/ S2214-109X(18) 30436—4.
- Karki B., Kittel G., Bolokon I. Jr, Duke T. Active community-based case finding for tuberculosis with limited resources. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2017;29(1):17—27. doi: 10.1177/10105 39516 683497.
- Silva E.N., Pereira A.C.E., de Araujo W.N., Elias F.T.S. A systematic review of economic evaluations of interventions to tackle tuberculosis in homeless people. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018;42:e40. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2018. 40.
- Machekera S .M., Wilkinson E., Hinderaker S.G., Mabhala M., Zishiri C., Ncube R.T., et al. A comparison of the yield and relative cost of active tuberculosis case-finding algorithms in Zimbabwe. Public Health Action. 2019;9(2):63—8. doi: 10.5588/pha.18.0098.
- Bogdanova E., Mariandyshev O., Hinderaker S.G., Nikishova E., Kulizhskaya A., Sveshnikova O., Grjibovsk iA., Heldal E., Mariandyshev A. Mass screening for active case finding of pulmonary tuberculosis in the Russian Federation: how to save costs. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2019;23(7):830—37. doi: 10. 5588/ijtld.18.0449.
- Tyurin I.E. Screening of respiratory diseases: modern tendencies. Pulmonology and Allergology. [Pul`monologiya i allergologiya]. 2011;(2):14—6 (In Russian).
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of programmatic screening strategies for latent tuberculosis infection in the EU/EEA. Technical report. Stockholm: ECDC; 2018.
- WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 3: Diagnosis tests for tuberculosis infection. Geneva: WHO; 2022.
- Zazimko L.A. Use of Mantoux test and Diaskintest for mass and individual diagnosis of TB. Medical Alfabet. [Medicinskiy alfavit]. 2013;(1):1—3 (In Russian).
- Borodulina E.A. Screening for TB. Modern recommendations. Allergology and Immunology in Pediatrics. [Allergologiya i Immunologiya v pediatrii]. 2017;49(2):29—33 (In Russian).
- Aksenova V.A. Diaskintest: new tuberculosis screening test. Pulmonology. [Pulmonologiya]. 2011;65(6):35—39 (In Russian).
- Eralieva L.T., Rakisheva A.S., Telegina E.P., Umutbaeva G.B. Immunological test T-SPOT.TB in diagnostics of latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis. Phthisiopulmonology. [Ftiziopulmonologiya]. 2018;32(2):17—22 (In Russian).
- Akr C.J. S., Usharrafien U.M., Banna H.S., Hoteit R.AS., Ashi K.Z., Rahm D.V. Risks and benefits of QuantiFERONW-TB testing for LTBI screening of health workers. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2021;25(1):72—4. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.20.0334.
- Surve S., Bhor V., Naukariya K., Beguem S., Munne K., Tipre Pranita, et.al. Discordance between TST and QFT-TBGold Plus for latent tuberculosis screening among under-five children an interim analysis. J Tropical Pediatrics. 2021;67(6):1—8. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmab103.
- Kerani R.P., Shapiro A.E., Strick L.B. A pilot TB screening model in a U.S. prison population using tuberculin skin test and interferon gamma release assay based on country of origin. Journal of Correctional Health Care. 2021;27(4):259—64.