Email this article 
Analysis of developed innovative technologies within the framework of clinical testing in medical care profiles
- Authors: Gabrielyan A.1, Alexandrova O.2, Mikhailov I.3,4,5
- Affiliations:
- City Clinical Hospital named after A. K. Yeramishantsev of the Moscow Healthcare Department
- N. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
- N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
- Center of Expertise and Quality Control of Healthcare of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education
- Issue: No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 64-69
- Section: Научная статья
- URL: http://bulleten-nriph.ru/journal/article/view/2686
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.69541/NRIPH.2025.01.010
- Cite item
Abstract
The objective of the study was to analyze of developed innovative technologies within the framework of clinical testing in
medical care profiles. To conduct this analysis the clinical testing protocols for 2023 and 2024 from the website of the Ministry of Health
of the Russian Federation were used (https://minzdrav.gov.ru/poleznye-resursy/protokoly-klinicheskoy-aprobatsii/klinicheskoy-aprobatsii). Based on the analysis of the application of the developed innovative technologies within the framework of clinical testing by medical
care profiles for 2023, it was found that the largest number of methods (protocols) were for cardiovascular surgery (38.61%). Based on the
analysis of the distribution of developed innovative technologies within the framework of clinical testing by types (stages of the treatment and diagnostic process) for 2023, it was found that the largest number of methods (protocols) were for treatment methods —
84.16%, which corresponds to 85 methods out of 101 clinical testing methods included in the analysis for 2023. Based on the analysis of
the use of developed innovative technologies within the framework of clinical testing by medical care profiles for 2024, it was found that
the largest number of methods (protocols) were in obstetrics and gynecology — 42.03%, which corresponds to 29 implemented clinical
testing protocols. In 2024, medical care using innovative medical technologies within the framework of clinical testing was mainly provided within the framework of treatment methods in the profiles of obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics and neonatology in those federal
medical organizations that provide medical care within the framework of clinical testing. Compared to 2023, in 2024 there is a clear emphasis on innovative methods of providing medical care aimed at protecting motherhood and childhood, which is one of the main priorities of the healthcare system of the Russian Federation for the period from 2025 to 2030.
About the authors
Arthur R. Gabrielyan
City Clinical Hospital named after A. K. Yeramishantsev of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Author for correspondence.
Email: gkb-eramishanzeva@zdrav.mos.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
Oksana Yu Alexandrova
N. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
Email: aou18@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0761-1838
Russian Federation, 105064, Moscow, Russian Federation
Ilya A. Mikhailov
N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health;Center of Expertise and Quality Control of Healthcare of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation;
Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education
Email: mikhailov@rosmedex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8020-369X
Russian Federation, 105064, Moscow, Russian Federation;
Moscow, Russian Federation;
Moscow, Russian Federation
References
- Lehman W. E.K., Simpson D. D., Knight D. K., Flynn P. M. Integration of treatment innovation planning and implementation: strategic process models and organizational challenges. Psychology
- of Addictive Behaviors. 2011;25(2):252—261. doi: 10.1037/a0022682
- May C. Agency and implementation: understanding the embedding of healthcare innovations in practice. Soc. Sci. Med.
- ;78:26—33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.021
- Wandersman A., Duffy J., Flaspohler P., Noonan R., Lubell K., Stillman L., et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am. J. Community Psychol. 2008;41(3—4):171—181. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z
- Schell S. F., Luke D. A., Schooley M. W., Elliott M. B., Herbers S. H.,
- Mueller N. B., et al. Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework. Implement. Sci. 2013;(8):15. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-15
- Scheirer M. A., Dearing J. W. An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. Am. J. Public Health.
- ;101(11):2059—2067. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300193
- Aarons G. A., Hurlburt M., Horwitz S. M. Advancing a conceptual
- model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm. Policy Ment. Health. 2011;38(1):4—23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7
- Meyers D. C., Durlak J. A., Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am. J. Community Psychol. 2012;50(3—4):462—480. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x
- Palmer D., Kramlich D. An introduction to the multisystem model
- of knowledge integration and translation. ANS. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 2011;34(1):29—38. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0b013e318209439f
