Email this article 
The impact of the information environment on the population's coverage of preventive vaccinations
- Authors: Adamov D.A.1, Oynotkinova O.S.1, Kukshina A.A.1, Pokusaev A.S.1
- Affiliations:
- GBU Scientific Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of the Moscow Department of Healthcare, 115184, Moscow, Russian Federation
- Issue: No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 101-105
- Section: Общественное здоровье и организация здравоохранения
- URL: https://bulleten-nriph.ru/journal/article/view/2909
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.69541/NRIPH.2025.02.018
- Cite item
Abstract
The article examines the impact of the information environment on the level of population coverage with preventive vaccinations in the context of the digitalization of society and the dissemination of false information. The key information barriers and factors of trust in sources of information about vaccination are described. The data from sociological and epidemiological studies, statistics on vaccination coverage in Russia and abroad are presented, as well as an assessment of the role of government policy and media support for preventive campaigns. The statements of experts in the field of immunoprophylaxis and the provisions of current regulatory documents regulating the field of vaccine prevention are analyzed.
About the authors
Denis A. Adamov
GBU Scientific Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of the Moscow Department of Healthcare, 115184, Moscow, Russian Federation
Email: AdamovDA@zdrav.mos.ru
Olga S. Oynotkinova
Email: olga-oynotkinova@yandex.ru
Anastasia A. Kukshina
Email: kukshina@list.ru
Anton S. Pokusaev
GBU Scientific Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of the Moscow Department of Healthcare, 115184, Moscow, Russian Federation
Email: PokusaevAS@zdrav.mos.ru
References
- Kelman H. C. Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly. 196;25(1):57—78.
- Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
- Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179—211.
- Entman R. M. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication. 1993;43(4):51—58.
- Войтешонок А. Е. Цифровые медиа и трансформация доверия в здравоохранении. Вестник общественного мнения. 2021;118(2):85—99.
- Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy. 1992;100(5):992—1026.
- World Health Organization. Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting healthy behaviours and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
- Willis N., Hill S., Kaufman J. et al. “Communicate to vaccinate”: the development of a taxonomy of communication interventions to improve routine childhood vaccination. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2013;(13):13—23.
- Гофман И. Е. Социальное доверие и институциональная коммуникация в здравоохранении. Социологические исследования. 2022;(10):89—96.
- Bettle T. The psychology of vaccine hesitancy: Fear, control and narrative power. Journal of Public Health Policy. 2020;(41):3401—415.
